Return to Browse Photos

Upload Your Photos

Blog/Web Page	<table><tr><td><a href="http://www.flightaware.com/photos/view/10247416-198a88d4f0e000b27667051f1e999df732785310/user/MASAHIKOOHASHI/sort/votes/page/1"><img src="https://photos.flightaware.com/photos/retriever/17b6e0f5eb398ee673114222185620e019c1d754" alt="FlightAware Photo" width="640" height="427" /></a></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: right; font-style: italic; size: 10pt;;">Photo Courtesy of FlightAware.com</td></tr></table>
Web Forum	[url=http://www.flightaware.com/photos/view/10247416-198a88d4f0e000b27667051f1e999df732785310/user/MASAHIKOOHASHI/sort/votes/page/1][img]https://photos.flightaware.com/photos/retriever/17b6e0f5eb398ee673114222185620e019c1d754[/img]Photo Courtesy of FlightAware.com[/url]

77-0352 —

Submitted 2 years ago

11 of 77-0352 42 of E3 402 at RJOI

MASAHIKO OHASHI

Comments

Please log in or register to post a comment.

skylab722 years ago

So which airframes will stay in service longer, 707 or B-52?

Report

gorillazilla2 years ago

I would guess the B-52. The 707 can be replaced by the 767 airframe as with the new tankers. To replace the B would require a whole new design, with the attendant cost, or transitioning entirely to the B-1 and B-2 which they could have done years ago.

Report

ACTIVITY LOG

Want a full history search for 77-0352 dating back to 1998? Buy now. Get it within one hour.

Date	Aircraft	Origin	Destination	Departure	Arrival	Duration
No Recent History Data
Basic users (becoming a basic user is free and easy!) view 3 months history. Join

77-0352 —

Comments

Please log in or register to post a comment.

Login