Back to Squawk list
  • -3

Battery Problems on Boeing's 787 Dreamliner Are Back

Submitted
JAL reported a problem with the battery during a flight from Helsinki to Tokyo on Friday. Back to the drawing board! (wallstcheatsheet.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


[This poster has been suspended.]

wx1996
wx1996 2
I like this quote from the article:

He emphasised that the incident was “not a battery problem” and therefore unlikely to be linked to the battery problems that plagued the 787 earlier this year.
preacher1
preacher1 2
My money is on the cockpit indicator
AWAAlum
AWAAlum 1
In which case, it would be an isolated incident???
preacher1
preacher1 2
I would call it that, and only in the news since it was a 787 and the previous battery problems they have had. That's just my opinion, but since there was no overheating or visible problems, I'll go with process of elimination. As I said, if it had not been on a 787, it probably wouldn't have made the news for you to post.LOL
PhotoFinish
PhotoFinish 2
Sounds like an isolated incident, maybe the indicator, maybe the charger. But key is that it was not the battery having stability issues (which is the potentially looming issue).

It would make sense for Boeing to quietly certify an old school battery and make it available to airlines as an option and/or to keep it around (just in case). That way, if they ever have another battery stability issue, they can seamlessly transition to the old school chemistry WITHOUT having another grounding incident (which would be unnecessary bad press).
AWAAlum
AWAAlum 0
No, I'm sure you're right about it not being in the news, but, call me a skeptic, I'm a bit leery of flying one.
preacher1
preacher1 2
Well, a lot of folks are, just because it's new and has had some problems. You probably wouldn't give a 2nnd thought to getting on a 777 but they were brand new at one time also.
AWAAlum
AWAAlum 1
True. But I won't buy a 1st generation car, either.
PhotoFinish
PhotoFinish 1
The flightglobal article was more informative.

The wall st cheat sheet article was (surprise, surprise) sensatiinalistic and alarmist.

It stated "However, the voltage and electrical current were within normal range and there was no effect on the remainder of the flight,” the airline added. 

But then added the factually incorrect: 'The battery was removed and inspections are ongoing.' (instead of battery charger.)
PhotoFinish
PhotoFinish 1
All they have to do is certify a heavier old school chemistry battery, while they work out a more stable modern chemistry battery.

The plane and its' batteries must be reliable.
yr2012
matt jensen -2
They are going to regret buying these planes.

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss