Back to Squawk list
  • 18

Bad Piloting And Bad ATC At Teterboro

Submitted
Just another day on the frequency? Maybe not. The encounter involves Newark Approach, and the pilots in control of a NetJets Cessna Citation Latitude (EJA636 – Execjet 636) aircraft flying into Teterboro Airport. (www.gatechecked.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


LeanderWilliams
I heard this interaction on VASAviation... I'm no pilot but I have heard (Also on VAS) when there are more than one aircraft with similar callsigns the tower normally indicates that to each aircraft when giving instructions. They will say something like another "similar company flight #"
briansfreeman
Brian Freeman 1
Can someone please explain the methodology - if there is any - behind assigning flight numbers? Are they just randomly assigned by the carrier or do they have some significance? I know similar sounding callsigns are going to be unavoidable at times, but it sure seems like they could be much safer if the callsigns were shorter, more distinctive, and actually served a purpose besides just identifying the aircraft.
Highflyer1950
Highflyer1950 1
One use of numbers is a scheduled air carrier typically has a route that repeats every day, every week etc. Therefore ATC actually has previous knowledge of the flights in and out of an airport. Small commercial Non-scheduled or on demand charter really should use the registration. 40 years ago there wouldn’t have been that much confusion but todays traffic volumes of private or on demand charter tends to muck up the system……especially when very busy. Just my two cents.
sullyvsn
There are a lot of ExecJet flights into TEB. You think those pilots would understand that there may be very similar call signs to them and pay attention to their flight numbers.

Also TEB has height restrictions on incoming and outgoing aircraft because Newark in/out flights are often going in the airspace above them.
sullyvsn
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/acf/media/Presentations/19-01-RD331-TEB-AAUP_ALT-SID-STAR_Concept_RBoll.pdf
n555cf
rbt schaffer 5
Who is on First ..... What is on Second ... I don't know is on Third .... What throws it to Who .... I don't know .... No, I don't know is on Third..... WHAT?
Nooge
Nooge 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRS7SrdDH4o
n555cf
rbt schaffer 1
Thanks!! That one is really great ... You know, back when I was tooling around the skies, seems I always formed a mental map of every airplane I heard the controller talk to... and could visualise my spot in line on approach... Then again I've met people who couldn't reach around and put thread a nut on a bolt without looking at it
Highflyer1950
Highflyer1950 2
Maybe they didn’t know how to either program/fly the Rnav 24 and were fishing for vfr conditions to continue visually. Either way, they don’t belong in the ifr environment……..I smell a competency check coming from the CP.
Highflyer1950
Highflyer1950 1
in addition, when you miss that many crossing restrictions ( and in the NYC TraCon airspace) plus the radio work does not in-still a lot of confidence………I might be inclined to send them to KMMU or KSWF. This could have gone wrong on so many levels?
bbabis
bbabis 3
Children of the magenta at its finest. Push a button, turn a knob, touch anything but the controls!
Frankshumate
Frank Shumate -3
I’ve flown in and out of KEWR no less than 300 times in my past career. I consider the New York area controllers to be some of the best. Sounds the FlexJet pilots could be D.E.I.
redmdz
Mike Ziemann 2
Aside from an initial check-in with the wrong tail number, what did the Flexjet pilots do wrong that you're calling them out for? "Execjet," the subject of this entire video, is the NetJets callsign.
darjr26
darjr26 9
It sounds like two tired pilots, not working very well with each other, resulting in very sloppy flying. The controller on the other hand needs to think about his future and whether he really wants to work as a controller at a busy radar facility.
Bayouflier
Bayouflier 13
Surprisingly solid analysis by a non-aviator.
GuyMaira
Guy Maira 13
TEB is another airport with good controllers AND bad. Last year in VFR conditions I was watching an aircraft get closer while we were on approach control. Eventually we got an RA. When I told the controller he ignored me more than once. I asked him for the supervisors phone number and had to ask 3 times. I can't remember now whether he gave it to me or I got it from the tower. On the way to the hotel I called the supervisor and his response was, "TEB is a very busy airport and we get RA's all the time". No concern at all. When my buddy who was a tower chief at my local airport retired he told me the new hiring practices ( a few years ago) regarding ATC new hires. His recommendation--> Don't let them kill you.
sledogpilot
Duane Mader -5
DEI has no business in aviation
avgas01
wow !!! A lot of aircraft replying back with wrong tail numbers
captrags80
Yes. Also, EJA636 answered numerous ATC transmissions without using his callsign. REALLY sloppy radio work.
spinoneone
Paul Wisgerhof 10
Confusion reigned supreme on this one. Everyone involved is lucky it resulted in nothing more than a phone call.
coinflyer
coinflyer 4
This could easily have become another MentourPilot video...

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss