All
← Back to Squawk list
Airbus Issues Urgent Safety Directive After Discovery of Solar Radiation Data Corruption Risk in A320 Family
Airbus has called for immediate precautionary action across all global operators of A320 Family aircraft following the discovery of a rare but critical vulnerability linked to intense solar radiation. (aeroxplorer.com) More...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
As a former software engineer, I don't buy Airbus's explanation. Since a rollback to the previous version fixes the problem, the actual fault must logically be something that was changed in the latest update. Maybe they removed memory checking for flipped bits, or changed how the ECAS reacts when it finds that. But it was a change made by Airbus, not solely solar radiation.
As another former software/hardware engineer, I agree 100%.
One of those "just one line of code" upgrades that they wanted pushed out quickly? Doing QA testing for Positive Train Control on the train dispatcher's CTC software, that was always the excuse for just give it a quick look, we have to get this new (unrelated) feature out ASAP - maybe it got by because the test team was pressured to do so and never got a chance to find it.
But no matter the how, the rollback says it all.
But no matter the how, the rollback says it all.
" ... following the discovery of a rare but critical vulnerability linked to intense CORNER CUTTING".
I fixed it for them. :)
I fixed it for them. :)
It's reported that over 5000 of the 6000 affected aircraft had already had the update (? Backdate?) applied by the time this became news.
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/a320-return-to-service-airbus-software-fixes-easa-directive
https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/a320-return-to-service-airbus-software-fixes-easa-directive
Odd. This article reports there have been no accidents or incidents. The New York Times previously reported a JetBlue diversion with 15 to 20 people sent to local hospitals to address non-life-threatening injuries. According to the website, this article was written with AI assistance. That would suggest an out-of- date data set or an AI hallucination.
